When
I was a kid in Brooklyn, we played a lot of games that were
improvised versions of the serious, canonical games that we saw
played on television. There was stickball which looked like baseball
with a broomstick bat and a pink 'spaldeen' ball. it was played in
the street, usually with a manhole cover as home plate and temporary
bases assigned to car doors or fire hydrants. the rules were sort of
ad-hoc and in the absence of umpires, there were a lot of disputed
calls. since the game was far more important than the outcome, we
never let a disagreement over a fair or foul ball stop play.
If
we couldn't agree on a call, the most common result was an agreement
to do it over. Once both sides acknowledge that the other isn't
willing to concede and neither is interested in taking the ball and
going home, we'd agree: 'okay, it's a do-over'. A do-over wasn't, of
course, a replay of the original event: that would have been
impossible. Instead, a do-over was a completely fresh iteration of
the opportunity that had just occurred. It's still two strikes and
one out and you're still up and we take it from there.
A
Holy Do-Over in a relationship is a little like that. Something bad
happened: something where neither of you did your best and the
outcome isn't very satisfying. He was accusatory, she was defensive.
He sulked, she yelled. She was unkind, he was deaf. The outcome
sucked, you both feel terrible. Chances are that you can't unwind the
event, you can't blot it out and your mutual failure sits like a
smelly embarrassment between you. You can't have an Undo, but you can
have a Do-Over.
A
Do-Over is an agreement to suspend your feelings for the moment, to
see them as mere artifacts of a need, whiskers to be shaved off and
allowed to grow back in a different color and texture. In a Do-Over
you return to your needs, consider your love, take up your courage
and act the way you might have acted the first time if you had been
true to yourself.
Of
course, the kind of Do-Over we're talking about here has higher
stakes than the street ball version.You're playing with each other's
humanity, which is to say that your staking your own on the outcome.
In a Holy Do-Over, everybody wins.
Guidelines
for a useful Holy Do-Over
•wait
as long as you need to, but no longer
one
necessary pre-condition is that both of you have taken a step back
from where you were emotionally. you now see your behavior as a
'thing-you-did' and not as 'you'. As long as you're still identifiied
with what you just did and said, you can only have a Repeat, which is
not the same as a Do-Over.
with
practice, the latency period can be very short. Couples who have
learned to play the game can sometimes regroup immediately as both of
them realize that their best selves weren't operating.
•replicate,
don't duplicate
in
so far as you can return to the place where the first event happened,
do so. if you can make the situation similar in any other way, good
for you. it's a mistake to strive for cinematic perfection though.
For one thing, all that obsessing just gets in the way. More
importantly, you want cues in the environment that tell you that this
is new, that you are free to do and be as you didn't the last time.
•immerse
yourself in the feeling, but don't rehearse.
the
point of a do-over is to enlist your best self to show up and be you.
one way to scare that best self away is to give yourself a script.
it
doesn't matter if you wrote the script or if you borrowed it from
someone else: a re-do is not a performance, it's a natural emanation
of
your reflected, refined essential self. if you be you, but don't be
rehearsed.
Magic
has responsibilities.
Religions
have forbidden magic for a reason. Salem witches, ecc. the magician
abrogates the powers of the divine:
in
truth the magician commands what the religious supplicant begs for.
When
you mess around with the laws of nature, you're very much
obliged to respect the outcomes of your experiments.
so
what you're doing here is dangerous stuff: powerful and sacred. done
frivolously, it won't work; done half-seriously it could make you
crazy.
you're
playing around with two natural laws.
first,
you're denying time; you're going backwards by acting as if time
hadn't elapsed and you have your hands on the hands of the clock.
second,
you're screwing with cause and effect. you're taking the effect of
some previous act and using it as the cause of the original act
itself.
(stay
with me now) your do-over is an effect that's (in effect) becoming
the cause of its own cause.
dizzy
yet? good.
so
that's why you have to approach the act of the do-over with a certain
gravity if not outright reverence. you're bending the laws of nature
for your own interests. make sure it's worth it. don't joke, pray.
No comments:
Post a Comment